Resized to 73% of original (view original)
miyu edelfelt (fate and 1 more) generated by laboman using momoiropony
AI Metadata
Prompt score_9, score_8_up, score_7_up, source anime, prefect lighting, very aesthetic, BREAK, anime screencap, anime coloring, <lora:miyu.pony:1>1girl, miyu, small breasts, BREAK, blush, seductive smile, looking at viewer, shiny skin, wide hips, thick thighs, <lora:Expressive_H:1>, Expressiveh, BREAK, fellatio, oral, penis, erection, kneeling, from side, upper body, 1boy, hetero, solo focus, motion lines, blush, nose blush
Negative prompt score_6, score_5, score_4, source_cartoon, source_furry, source_pony, sketch, painting, monochrome, 3d, photorealistic, lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, cropped, worst quality, low quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry, artist name, mosaic censoring, censored, bar censor, abs, muscular
Sampler DPM++ 2M Karras
Seed 721324086
Steps 25
Cfg Scale 7
Model Hash 45c2836735
Clip Skip 2
Denoising Strength 0.45
Hires Steps 20
Hires Upscale 1.5
Hires Upscaler R-ESRGAN 4x+ Anime6B
Lora Hashes miyu.pony: 176d9c563e26, Expressive_H: 5671f20a9a6b, MuDDetailer use prompt edit: False, MuDDetailer use prompt edit b: False, MuDDetailer model a: bbox/mmdet_anime-face_yolov3.pth [38208bb6], MuDDetailer conf a: 30, MuDDetailer max detection a: 20, MuDDetailer dilation a: 4, MuDDetailer offset x a: 0, MuDDetailer offset y a: 0, MuDDetailer mask blur: 4, MuDDetailer denoising: 0.45, MuDDetailer inpaint full: True, MuDDetailer inpaint padding: 32, MuDDetailer inpaint width: 0, MuDDetailer inpaint height: 0, MuDDetailer CFG scale: 0, MuDDetailer steps: 0, MuDDetailer noise multiplier: 0, Mask blur: 4, Inpaint area: Only masked, Masked area padding: 32, MuDDetailer detection a: A-face 0.9751,307,418,928,1062
Model momoiropony_v14
Size 768x1152
Version f0.0.17v1.8.0rc-latest-276-g29be1da7
  • Comments
    •
    ANJU
    [hidden]

    JizzMaster69 said:

    To site owners: please stop censoring good AI art by "reviewing" when all you're doing is not approving it because of "loli".

    Banned and expunged posts are probably the closest thing you can get to "censored" on here, I guess (which is either by takedown request or rule-breaking/illegal content). Deleted posts are open for anyone to see and there's even a direct link on the main page to show all deleted posts.

    Next, the approvers have the right to disapprove a post for whatever reason they want. It may not seem fair, and technically it isn't, but if one is not interested in a post they're not going to be made to approve it regardless. That's why there's like 10+ of them (+ mod/admin), because some like certain niche content more than others and it gives more room to that stuff having a better chance of approval, under how the system works.

    As for this post, as of me writing this comment, it has been uploaded 20 hours ago; the approval period is three days. There is plenty of time for it to be approved and only one approver marked a reason for disapproval so far.

    2 Reply
    JizzMaster69
    [hidden]

    ANJU said:

    Banned and expunged posts are probably the closest thing you can get to "censored" on here, I guess (which is either by takedown request or rule-breaking/illegal content). Deleted posts are open for anyone to see and there's even a direct link on the main page to show all deleted posts.

    Next, the approvers have the right to disapprove a post for whatever reason they want. It may not seem fair, and technically it isn't, but if one is not interested in a post they're not going to be made to approve it regardless. That's why there's like 10+ of them (+ mod/admin), because some like certain niche content more than others and it gives more room to that stuff having a better chance of approval, under how the system works.

    As for this post, as of me writing this comment, it has been uploaded 20 hours ago; the approval period is three days. There is plenty of time for it to be approved and only one approver marked a reason for disapproval so far.

    Maybe my original comment was too harsh. I do understand your reasoning there. I would just say that it would make most sense not to disapprove any type of art that is simply well, good.

    I myself for example hate furry shit. I will still not be calling for it not to be displayed. The best solution would just be to approve everything that's well made enough and make use of filtering by tags for the main page... If it's already in place, I'm not aware of it. Just my thoughts there.

    0 Reply
    ANJU
    [hidden]

    JizzMaster69 said:

    *

    "Good" is subjective though. I've approved images that I thought were good that other approvers think aren't and vice-versa. Most everyone has their own standard of what is "good enough" for the site when the reality is that what is good enough is a standard created off of what is usually approved/undeleted, I guess.

    Anyway, part of the problem I neglected to mention is availability of approvers. Generally, if there aren't enough people looking at images it will definitely result in stuff slipping through the cracks, and if you find something you think should be approved, you're more than free to appeal it and give it another chance. I personally tend to be a little more lenient on appealed posts and approve some stuff even if I hate it, but that isn't the standard that approvers are held by.

    For whatever it's worth, I tend to gravitate toward the end of the queue (stuff nearing the end of the moderation period) and approved stuff there the most so being unapproved after 2 or even 3 days (before deletion) isn't always a sign a post will be deleted.

    1 Reply