AIBooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat

Artist

  • ? angel-kun 1

Copyright

  • ? original 49k

General

  • ? bird 758
  • ? blue sky 10k
  • ? day 20k
  • ? forest 4.0k
  • ? nature 5.7k
  • ? plant 5.2k
  • ? shade 311
  • ? sky 20k
  • ? trail 4
  • ? tree 10k

Information

  • ID: 162465
  • Uploader: M1eLbkvG1sNvqkwL7LlkidMk »
  • Date: 11 days ago
  • Size: 310 KB .jpg (1216x832) »
  • Source: boards.4chan.org/b/thread/949540392#p949540964 »
  • Rating: General
  • Views: 67
  • Score: 1
  • Favorites: 0
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
  • AI Metadata

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days (8 days ago)

It has been reviewed by 2 approvers.

Resized to 69% of original (view original)
original generated by angel-kun
Original Commentary

Angel-kun 05/24/26(Sun)13:10:47 No.949540964

3c64d4f6-85c0-4949-bfab-d8c8288723e7.jpg (310 KB, 1216x832)
>>949540767
I think there are definitely cases it could be considered even to be good art.
Classical art will never go anywhere.
I'm sure with digital art there was the same shit flinging, but I just don't remember it.

I wouldn't consider pic related art, but someone else might
It's definitely not good art.
People who don't do art look at a sketchbook and see art. An artist may see it as something that is artful, but it's not a "work of art".

That's my main hangup with a lot of modern art.
I like some modernist stuff, like Frank Lloyd Wright.
But it looks more like a sketch or a study to me.

  • ‹ prev Search: -source:https://i.pximg.net status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • There are no comments.

    Terms / Privacy / Contact /