This feels one of the best ai hentai generations i feel like ive seen in awhile in terms depicting nudity while escaping the same looking styles these programs generate because they want to be in focus and have hard defined details or be simple and flat with colors, or just textures to emulate a painting.
its simple but well lit and warm. bloom with thin or no lines. while keeping the faces detailed.
must be a lot of manual tweaking and adjusting. * sigh * lol
>is there a pimple on my butt? "I can't see any pimples, but your panties seem a bit stuck in your crack. It must be uncomfortable, want me to pull them out?"
>is there a pimple on my butt? "I can't see any pimples, but your panties seem a bit stuck in your crack. It must be uncomfortable, want me to pull them out?"
You fool! You'll uncork the event horizon on her black hole and destroy the universe!
To site owners: please stop censoring good AI art by "reviewing" when all you're doing is not approving it because of "loli".
Banned and expunged posts are probably the closest thing you can get to "censored" on here, I guess (which is either by takedown request or rule-breaking/illegal content). Deleted posts are open for anyone to see and there's even a direct link on the main page to show all deleted posts.
Next, the approvers have the right to disapprove a post for whatever reason they want. It may not seem fair, and technically it isn't, but if one is not interested in a post they're not going to be made to approve it regardless. That's why there's like 10+ of them (+ mod/admin), because some like certain niche content more than others and it gives more room to that stuff having a better chance of approval, under how the system works.
As for this post, as of me writing this comment, it has been uploaded 20 hours ago; the approval period is three days. There is plenty of time for it to be approved and only one approver marked a reason for disapproval so far.
Banned and expunged posts are probably the closest thing you can get to "censored" on here, I guess (which is either by takedown request or rule-breaking/illegal content). Deleted posts are open for anyone to see and there's even a direct link on the main page to show all deleted posts.
Next, the approvers have the right to disapprove a post for whatever reason they want. It may not seem fair, and technically it isn't, but if one is not interested in a post they're not going to be made to approve it regardless. That's why there's like 10+ of them (+ mod/admin), because some like certain niche content more than others and it gives more room to that stuff having a better chance of approval, under how the system works.
As for this post, as of me writing this comment, it has been uploaded 20 hours ago; the approval period is three days. There is plenty of time for it to be approved and only one approver marked a reason for disapproval so far.
Maybe my original comment was too harsh. I do understand your reasoning there. I would just say that it would make most sense not to disapprove any type of art that is simply well, good.
I myself for example hate furry shit. I will still not be calling for it not to be displayed. The best solution would just be to approve everything that's well made enough and make use of filtering by tags for the main page... If it's already in place, I'm not aware of it. Just my thoughts there.
"Good" is subjective though. I've approved images that I thought were good that other approvers think aren't and vice-versa. Most everyone has their own standard of what is "good enough" for the site when the reality is that what is good enough is a standard created off of what is usually approved/undeleted, I guess.
Anyway, part of the problem I neglected to mention is availability of approvers. Generally, if there aren't enough people looking at images it will definitely result in stuff slipping through the cracks, and if you find something you think should be approved, you're more than free to appeal it and give it another chance. I personally tend to be a little more lenient on appealed posts and approve some stuff even if I hate it, but that isn't the standard that approvers are held by.
For whatever it's worth, I tend to gravitate toward the end of the queue (stuff nearing the end of the moderation period) and approved stuff there the most so being unapproved after 2 or even 3 days (before deletion) isn't always a sign a post will be deleted.
