Comments

[hidden]

9x39mmSP5 said:
Not any time soon here, given the lukewarm reception of the concept (see moderation history of this post)
Also, I'm more focused ATM on expanding dataset for corresponding lora.

What was the issue with the moderation history? I don't see the problem.
Anyway, where else do you post "[your] most degenerate shit"? Not civitai I assume?

[hidden]

n3 said:

Is there a reason you've been using exactly 29 steps as opposed to 28? Flexing your anlas? (Assuming you're subscribed.)

Kinda figured with extra steps, there would be better details. Not sure if true or not. And yeah, I'm subscribed. Also, sorry for replying late.

[hidden]

strong_hand said:

@arujal For future reference, instead of uploading the fixed version as a new post you should request a replacement of the old one on the forums.

Oh, oops, sorry. That wouldโ€™ve been better โ€” I had no idea. Thanks for letting me know.

[hidden]

This AI Artist makes me so irrationally angry, because not only does this person watermark his AI Gens, lmao... he also doesn't label his AI gens as AI on Pixiv, claims his images are tool assisted, blows up his images through upscaling to the point where they are burned, claims he "retouches it" even though it looks like the only retouching that has been done is Adetailer on the face, and fingers, because those area's aren't as burned as the rest of the images and don't have the weird upscaling burn pattern on them indicating those have been touched after the upscaling process. Then proceeds to leave tons of other issues in other images, like fingers melting into objects, etc. I honestly would like to know what is going through this dudes head.

Updated by WanderingDiffusion

[hidden]

Hackgets said:

To Mods: Beware of commentary.

To prioritize something is to subordinate everything else to it. To define something as justice is to define everything else as evil. Why do they do this? Because they seek only their own survival. Yet because of this, they fight and cannot survive.

Watch Pax tube on youtube,

[hidden]

tags, buddy

Edit: Here's the context. This post was originally tagged no_panties, to which someone off-site joked it was technically accurate. Presumably it's a typo for no_humans, so I fixed that, along with stacking yet another joke on top that's technically conforms better to tagging conventions.

Updated by n3

[hidden]

Archive said:

I literally thought exLight would like this style when I went through some of their works b4 uploading.

Haha well you were 100% right, if I was a fish you'd definitely know what bait to use to catch me. (eyes emoji)

[hidden]

exLight said:

I've liked pretty much every one of this artists images so far, thanks for posting them on the site Archive.

I literally thought exLight would like this style when I went through some of their works b4 uploading.

[hidden]

JBamba said:

You love to see it.

Actually I was searching for the best way to embed QR codes in images (using Controlnet), when I stumbled over this article SDXL ControlNet OpticalPattern (Optical illusions)

The Controlnet model used is sdxlControlnet_v10eOpticalpattern.safetensors. It works incredible well, the trick is to adjust the effect so that it can be seen at all, normally your first recognize it from a distance or in thumbnails, but do not see it up close. It can be easily finetuned to be almost unnoticeable :)

1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19